Your selections:
- McGee, Richard G., Graves, Lara E., Barnett, Adrian
Internal coherence matters: Lessons for nutrition and dietetics research
- Palermo, Claire, Reidlinger, Dianne P., Rees, Charlotte E.
How many papers should scientists be reviewing?: An analysis using verified peer review reports
Is peer review in academic publishing still working?
- Jackson, Liz, Peters, Michael A., Locke, Kirsten, Mihaila, Ramona, Stewart, Georgina, Tesar, Marek, Roberts, Peter, Ozoliņš, Jānis John, Benade, Leon, Devine, Nesta, Arndt, Sonja, Forster, Daniella, Gibbons, Andrew, Grierson, Elizabeth, Jandrić, Petar, Lazaroiu, George
- Lowry, Sean, de Freitas, Nancy
Access to journals through peer reviewers (Letter)
- McGee, Richard G., Hemsley, Bronwyn, Gill, Peter J.
Learning to be confident and capable journal reviewers: an Australian perspective
Using nominal group technique to develop a consensus derived model for peer review of teaching across a multi-school faculty
- Burrows, Tracy, Findlay, Naomi, Killen, Chloe, Dempsey, Shane E., Hunter, Sharyn, Chiarelli, Pauline, Snodgrass, Suzanne J.
Journal peer review: comparing the perceptions and quality judgments of experienced Australian reviewers in education and the physical sciences
Quality improvement research: can it be published? (editorial)
Peer review and its contribution to manuscript quality: an Australian perspective
Evaluation of an interpractice visit peer review program for rural Australian general practice registrars
Review of the Australian Incident Monitoring System
- Spigelman, Allan David, Swan, Judith
Multiple perspective assessment to manage free riders in group work
- Gajendran, Thayaparan, Brewer, Graham, Mackee, Jamie, Williams, Tony
Are you sure you would like to clear your session, including search history and login status?